Re: Kernel-image: 2.6-686 vs 2.6.8-2-686
From: rds (rustydstone_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: qngelo=20M.=20Rigo?=: "Installing Oracle 9i on debian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 04:06:54 -0800 (PST) To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
--- Andreas RiRippla.riripplmgmxet> wrote:
> But, I for one prefer _not_ to upgrade my kernel packages automatically,
> so I install the next version whenever I choose to. Which more and more
> makes sense to me, as the newest 2.6 kernels seem to have some stability
> issues at the moment, so I am happily running 2.6.7-1-686-smsmp.
That's a good point. But wouldn't you want to be "advised" that you need to
install a new kernel in case if, say, there is a security exploit in the "old"
kernel? That was the reasoning behind my desire to auto upgrade kernel.
-- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: qngelo=20M.=20Rigo?=: "Installing Oracle 9i on debian"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
