Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?
hjvm_at_freenet.de
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: apt-get update results."
- Next in thread: olli: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Reply: olli: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Reply: Joey Hess: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:23:00 +0200
Hello everybody!
(I hope this is the right list to post this...) I've installed Debian sarge from the current
testing on 29/03/2005 with Kernel 2.6 using four Raid1 partitions. I didn't install any
additional tasks with base-config at first. Everything went fine, I was able to reboot into
the system and to access the raid partitions. The root directory is on a raid partition and
even that works!
But: I started base-config and installed the desktop environment. The install went fine.
But after the next reboot the system was broken. The first raid partition with root on it
still worked, so I was able to boot into a minimal system. But the other three raid
partitions notably with /var and /home on it didn't work, so I got lots of error messages.
And now it becomes really funny: I was able to recreate the missing raid arrays
manually using mdadm --create and to mount them. It worked, I could use them. Yet
after another reboot they had vanished again. If I don't use base-config to install the
desktop environment but fetch the packages manually with aptitude everything is fine.
And if I make an install with Kernel 2.4 instead of 2.6 I can use base-config to install and
it works, too.
So it seems that using base-config after an install with Kernel 2.6 on raid partitions
breaks all raid partitions except the first. As there is a simple workaround, i. e. installing
the packages manually, it's not a big problem. But it took me two days to figure that out.
What was I doing wrong or might it be that there is a bug in base-config?
If anyone has encountered similar problems I'd be interested to hear about that.
Browsing the mailing lists I see that this problem already appeared in September 2004
and was supposed to be fixed a long time ago. But apparently it isn't, at least in my
case.
Thanks
Hans-Joerg v. Mettenheim
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Mike: "Re: apt-get update results."
- Next in thread: olli: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Reply: olli: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Reply: Joey Hess: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: [opensuse] complex confusing partition problem
... Another install you forgot about, ... only one 10.2 was installed on hdb.
... the hdb disk and renamed it sdc. ... One thing that helps is to have all partitions
"labeled". ... (SuSE) - Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?
... this bug -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294404 ... >
additional tasks with base-config at first. ... > the system and to access the raid
partitions. ... > install went fine. ... (Debian-User) - Re: (2nd) HDD Format & Setup Suggestions Please
... Backup - use the built in Windows Backup utility. ... 'normal' setup (sometimes
getting rid of Linux partitions, ... Beware of some crappy apps that install databases
in the ... >> would have considered SATA disc drives on a low cost SATA RAID controller
... (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware) - RE: FC2 Frist boot after clean Install
... Always a COMPLETELY clean install – using Drive Image utility to erase ... all
partitions and restore MBR. ... I compared the grub.conf files on each machine after the
FC2 install. ... different Asus model motherboards and different hard drives (Seagates
& ... (Fedora) - Re: Problem after converting FDisk Partitions to LVM
... The issue I was reporting about was, that my 2 freshly installed W4.0 partitions didn't
boot up anymore, after the eCS beta was installed and changed FDisk to LVM in the process.
... I wasn't trying to migrate an existing, over time matured W4 system to eCS, rather than trying
to learn about the shortcomings of the latest FDisk and potential dangers in possibly switching my W4
FP16+ box to LVM, in order to install and boot additional OS' from HDD areas beyond FDisk's limited
abilities. ... (comp.os.os2.setup.storage)