Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?

hjvm_at_freenet.de
Date: 03/31/05

  • Next message: Jim MacBaine: "Re: SSL client certificate with mutt?"
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:23:00 +0200
    
    

    Hello everybody!

    (I hope this is the right list to post this...) I've installed Debian sarge from the current
    testing on 29/03/2005 with Kernel 2.6 using four Raid1 partitions. I didn't install any
    additional tasks with base-config at first. Everything went fine, I was able to reboot into
    the system and to access the raid partitions. The root directory is on a raid partition and
    even that works!
    But: I started base-config and installed the desktop environment. The install went fine.
    But after the next reboot the system was broken. The first raid partition with root on it
    still worked, so I was able to boot into a minimal system. But the other three raid
    partitions notably with /var and /home on it didn't work, so I got lots of error messages.
    And now it becomes really funny: I was able to recreate the missing raid arrays
    manually using mdadm --create and to mount them. It worked, I could use them. Yet
    after another reboot they had vanished again. If I don't use base-config to install the
    desktop environment but fetch the packages manually with aptitude everything is fine.
    And if I make an install with Kernel 2.4 instead of 2.6 I can use base-config to install and
    it works, too.
    So it seems that using base-config after an install with Kernel 2.6 on raid partitions
    breaks all raid partitions except the first. As there is a simple workaround, i. e. installing
    the packages manually, it's not a big problem. But it took me two days to figure that out.
    What was I doing wrong or might it be that there is a bug in base-config?
    If anyone has encountered similar problems I'd be interested to hear about that.
    Browsing the mailing lists I see that this problem already appeared in September 2004
    and was supposed to be fixed a long time ago. But apparently it isn't, at least in my
    case.

    Thanks
    Hans-Joerg v. Mettenheim

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Jim MacBaine: "Re: SSL client certificate with mutt?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [opensuse] complex confusing partition problem
      ... Another install you forgot about, ... only one 10.2 was installed on hdb. ... the hdb disk and renamed it sdc. ... One thing that helps is to have all partitions "labeled". ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?
      ... this bug -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294404 ... > additional tasks with base-config at first. ... > the system and to access the raid partitions. ... > install went fine. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: (2nd) HDD Format & Setup Suggestions Please
      ... Backup - use the built in Windows Backup utility. ... 'normal' setup (sometimes getting rid of Linux partitions, ... Beware of some crappy apps that install databases in the ... >> would have considered SATA disc drives on a low cost SATA RAID controller ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
    • RE: FC2 Frist boot after clean Install
      ... Always a COMPLETELY clean install – using Drive Image utility to erase ... all partitions and restore MBR. ... I compared the grub.conf files on each machine after the FC2 install. ... different Asus model motherboards and different hard drives (Seagates & ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: No System Restore/no Defrag/No adminstrator rights.
      ... Malwarebytes, Superantispyware, Spybot S & D, plus my ISP's in-house AV ... You can scan all the partitions ... But at the end of the day, a fresh install may be the quickest solution. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)