Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?
From: olli (olito24_at_gmx.de)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: Michael Marsh: "Re: apt-get update results."
- In reply to: hjvm_at_freenet.de: "Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Next in thread: hjvm_at_freenet.de: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Reply: hjvm_at_freenet.de: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:26:10 +0200 To: hjvm@freenet.de
hi,
i'm having a similar problem at the moment and i'm trying to figure out
if it is caused by
this bug -> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294404
you may have a look at a description of my case:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/03/msg03799.html
and the following discussion:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/03/msg03949.html
regards,
oliver
Am 31.03.2005 um 14:23 schrieb hjvm@freenet.de:
> Hello everybody!
>
> (I hope this is the right list to post this...) I've installed Debian
> sarge from the current
> testing on 29/03/2005 with Kernel 2.6 using four Raid1 partitions. I
> didn't install any
> additional tasks with base-config at first. Everything went fine, I
> was able to reboot into
> the system and to access the raid partitions. The root directory is on
> a raid partition and
> even that works!
> But: I started base-config and installed the desktop environment. The
> install went fine.
> But after the next reboot the system was broken. The first raid
> partition with root on it
> still worked, so I was able to boot into a minimal system. But the
> other three raid
> partitions notably with /var and /home on it didn't work, so I got
> lots of error messages.
> And now it becomes really funny: I was able to recreate the missing
> raid arrays
> manually using mdadm --create and to mount them. It worked, I could
> use them. Yet
> after another reboot they had vanished again. If I don't use
> base-config to install the
> desktop environment but fetch the packages manually with aptitude
> everything is fine.
> And if I make an install with Kernel 2.4 instead of 2.6 I can use
> base-config to install and
> it works, too.
> So it seems that using base-config after an install with Kernel 2.6 on
> raid partitions
> breaks all raid partitions except the first. As there is a simple
> workaround, i. e. installing
> the packages manually, it's not a big problem. But it took me two days
> to figure that out.
> What was I doing wrong or might it be that there is a bug in
> base-config?
> If anyone has encountered similar problems I'd be interested to hear
> about that.
> Browsing the mailing lists I see that this problem already appeared in
> September 2004
> and was supposed to be fixed a long time ago. But apparently it isn't,
> at least in my
> case.
>
> Thanks
> Hans-Joerg v. Mettenheim
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Michael Marsh: "Re: apt-get update results."
- In reply to: hjvm_at_freenet.de: "Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Next in thread: hjvm_at_freenet.de: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Reply: hjvm_at_freenet.de: "Re: Kernel 2.6 + Raid + base-config = problem?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]