Re: apt package database performance
From: John Hasler (jhasler_at_debian.org)
Date: 04/17/05
- Previous message: Nate Bargmann: "Re: Off-Topic: Connection between martial arts and F/OS Software"
- In reply to: Lee Braiden: "Re: apt package database performance"
- Next in thread: Lee Braiden: "Re: apt package database performance"
- Reply: Lee Braiden: "Re: apt package database performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:55:54 -0500
Lee writes:
> I wonder if listbugs etc. could be more tightly integrated so that they
> share less run through the package list rather than each going over the
> packages separately Maybe they already do this, but I get the impression
> that they're all just add-on shell scripts running with low-granularity
> hooks such as 'pre-install' etc.
Apt is a _library_. All these programs (including apt-get) use it.
-- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Nate Bargmann: "Re: Off-Topic: Connection between martial arts and F/OS Software"
- In reply to: Lee Braiden: "Re: apt package database performance"
- Next in thread: Lee Braiden: "Re: apt package database performance"
- Reply: Lee Braiden: "Re: apt package database performance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|