Re: SCSI, ATAPI and burners [SOLVED]

From: Jim Hall (volunteer_at_revealed.net)
Date: 04/19/05

  • Next message: Ernst-Magne Vindal: "howto update PATH"
    Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:51:03 -0500
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    Jim Hall wrote:
    > Bill Day wrote:
    >
    >> When I did my original Woody installation I too had that problem, but
    >> with the installation of sarge and a 2.6 kernel I no longer had to add
    >> scsi emulation for my burner in lilo.conf or in grubs menu.1st.
    >>
    >> I suggest upgrading yoru kernel to a proper 2.6.x kernel for your
    >> arch, you will still have the option to boot the old kernel while you
    >> work out any bugs you may have with the new kernel(as long as your
    >> /boot is large enough), another one of my mistakes. I know better
    >> now, and have a /boot of 450MB, with plenty of room to play with new
    >> kernels. 8-)
    >>
    >> HTH
    >>
    >> On Tuesday March 29 2005 8:45 am, Jim Hall wrote:
    >>
    >>> Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:11:57 -0600, Jim Hall <volunteer@revealed.net>
    >>>
    >>>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >>>>> In Sarge, all of the installed burner packages are having problems.
    >>>>> Some
    >>>>> of the docs say I should define the burner as a SCSI device because
    >>>>> ATAPI is a form of SCSI.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The installer asked if I had SCSI devices. Should I have said "Yes"
    >>>>> (for
    >>>>> the sake of future installs)?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> 2.6 kernels already have native ATAPI support.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Since I used the default 2.4 kernel, I can only use a 2.6 kernel on this
    >>> system if it's fairly safe (repeat: safe) to switch.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> Anyway, attaching a SCSI device in the future is straight-forward
    >>>> enough that it doesn't warrant reinstallation procedures.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> I wasn't considering actual future SCSI devices or reinstallation, only
    >>> the posibility that if I had said yes to the SCSI option when I
    >>> installed, I wouldn't be asking this question now.
    >>>
    >>> Jim
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    > I should be able to get on the system in question this weekend. I'll
    > check out what's been suggested and run some experiments. I'll post back
    > the results early next week.
    >
    > Jim
    >
    >

    Sorry for the delay. I finally got to work on this system. I used a
    Knoppix v3.6 CD with the 2.6 kernel. I burned the Knoppix v3.7 iso
    perfectly. The 2.6 kernel appears to be the way to go. /boot is 118MB,
    so that looks OK.

    Another problem solved,
    Jim

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Ernst-Magne Vindal: "howto update PATH"