Re: Best file system for Disk quotas and undelete

From: Siju George (sgeorge.ml_at_gmail.com)
Date: 05/06/05

  • Next message: J.Bakshi: "vesafb problem in debian"
    Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:45:10 +0530
    To: Lee Braiden <jel@tundra.ath.cx>
    
    

    Thankyou so much Lee for your detailed reply.
    I appreciate them very much :-)

    On 5/6/05, Lee Braiden <jel@tundra.ath.cx> wrote:
    > On Friday 06 May 2005 10:33, Siju George wrote:

    >
    > Undeleting files shouldn't be part of a "strategy". At best, it's a last
    > resort. If it actually works, it's a *lucky* last resort. A combination of
    > backing up your important files (always a good idea), setting rm to be
    > interactive, and/or using the recycle bin/trashcan on your desktop instead of
    > a permanent deletion would be a much better way to go.
    >

    actually I don't run a GUI on this machine because it is a server that
    hosts some PHP website development.

    > Faubackup is pretty easy, if you want a *very* low maintenance backup
    > solution. Basically, you just edit it's config file for how many snapshots
    > you want to keep as backups (the last week, or the last three weeks, or every
    > month in the last year, etc.), and then edit the cron script for which
    > directories to backup. You'll then get a backup directory that keeps files
    > from those times. If you delete a file, just go to the backup directory, and
    > retrieve yesterday's copy.
    >

    Thanks a lot Lee for introducing Faubackup. I am going to try it. I
    heard of another software called Bacula. How do you compare both??
    which is better??

    > Most of all though: be careful! :D
    >

    yes :-)

    > > ext2? ext3? ReiserFS? JFS?
    >
    > Personally, I prefer XFS. ReiserFS is a good choice too, but I still have
    > stability concerns regarding Reiser.
    >

    Presently I am using Ext3 is XFS better than Ext3??
    Will I be able to get the option to install XFS while installing from
    the Woody 3.0r5 CD?
    Or should I do something else to get XFS???

    Thanks a lot once again for your reply :-)

    kind regards

    Siju


  • Next message: J.Bakshi: "vesafb problem in debian"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: which to use: ext3, JFS, XFS, ReiserFS?
      ... debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. ... by UNIX ffs (fast filesystem) with decades of history. ... months ago when we heard from the Debian maintainer for the JFS utils ... I changed back to ext3. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: ReiseFS vs XFS
      ... > installation of the Debian system with XFS. ... ReiserFS is faster than ext3 ONLY for files under 4kB. ... would use the ext3 filesystem. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Panic with XFS on RHEL5 (2.6.18-8.1.8.el5)
      ... I've got a box running RHEL5 and haven't been impressed by ext3 ... so often the kernel panics as below. ... Does anyone have any hits/tips for using XFS on Red Hat? ... function in the call stack suggested to me that you might have an ext3 ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
      ... filesystem is the time it takes to mkfs it? ... Disable the fsck for ext3, ... (which is *always* a good idea, and the fact that it is hard to do with XFS ... you'd still get some disks that will fail due to mechanical ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Panic with XFS on RHEL5 (2.6.18-8.1.8.el5)
      ... I've got a box running RHEL5 and haven't been impressed by ext3 ... so often the kernel panics as below. ... Does anyone have any hits/tips for using XFS on Red Hat? ... I don't have any XFS filesystems mounted over loop devices on ext3. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)