Re: install sarge to boot on lvm on raid5 ???

From: Michael D Schleif (mds_at_helices.org)
Date: 05/10/05

  • Next message: Emmanuele BARBARO: "RE: INSTALLATION PROBLEM"
    Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 08:30:18 -0500
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    
    

    * On 2005:05:07:10:08:30-0500 I, Michael D Schleif <mds@helices.org>, scribed:
    > I downloaded sarge-i386-1.iso on 2 May 2005. I was happy to find
    > installation options for BOTH RAID5 and LVM, right there in the disk
    > partitioning menus.
    >
    > They weren't totally intuitive to me; but, I managed to configure LVM on
    > RAID5 without any errors.
    >
    > Then, I came to the boot loader step. It did NOT offer grub; rather, it
    > offered to configure LILO. Here is my problem:
    >
    > Where should LILO install the boot block?
    >
    > The first two options offered /dev/md0 -- neither of which are accepted
    > by this process. The third option (advanced) appears to allow me to
    > decide; but, I do NOT know where to put this.

    My research indicates a lot of changes, in this regard, since Woody;
    especially in the more recent 2.6.x kernels. I have found several
    HOWTO's based on Woody, and favoring Raid0/1; and most of those were
    written for Woody and 2.4.x kernels.

    Where is there a HOWTO for LVM on RAID that focuses on Sarge?

    Where is there a HOWTO for LVM on RAID that focuses on Raid5?

    How can this be done at initial install; rather than build on one disk,
    then build the Raid5 post-install?

    Which is better as boot loader in this scenario, Lilo or Grub?

    Is it better to leave a partition outside of the LVM? Which partition?
    Root (/)? /boot?

    Can this be done with everything on the Raid5?

    Can this be done with everything on the LVM?

    What do you think?

    -- 
    Best Regards,
    mds
    mds resource
    877.596.8237
    -
    Dare to fix things before they break . . .
    -
    Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
    we think we know.  The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . .
    --
    
    

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    


  • Next message: Emmanuele BARBARO: "RE: INSTALLATION PROBLEM"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: lvm
      ... you really want to install a OS and put systema nd data on the same ... If you override your LVM, ... install a additional disk and expand the LVM ... same device mapper your partition system is. ...
      (Fedora)
    • [opensuse] Re: linux in multiboot
      ... That leaves me with 251 GiB unpartitioned in LVM. ... I would make another LVM partition ... As to the /boot I'd have to suggest choosing one distro to manage the ... files from the other distro's /boot to the one you let install to the ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Paritions to install Ubuntu
      ... problem - physical partition sizes end up being fixed at ... install time and it's very hard to ... LVM gives you a *virtual* ... Install it, ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: Cannot mount old drive with LVM partition - help!
      ... I have an FC3 install on a 200Gb IDE hard disk. ... ext3 partition. ... partition layout and LVM for root file system. ... rearrange them at will to make the drives appear as I wish. ...
      (alt.os.linux)
    • Re: Hosed Grub with the push of a button
      ... occupies part of the LVM. ... I don't think the developers of the program counted on some crazy button changing the partition table with one touch. ... Did it write over that portion of the disk or did it actually format the portion and place information from some storage chip on the mother board. ... My guess would be that the motherboard has a chip inside that has a compressed image of what was originally installed on the computer, like what a install CD would have. ...
      (Fedora)