Re: mutt + dovecot/squirrelmail + mbox ?
hmh_at_debian.org
Date: 06/10/05
- Previous message: Roberto C. Sanchez: "Re: Homebuilt vs. debian packages, and "apt-get upgrade""
- In reply to: Roberto C. Sanchez: "Re: mutt + dovecot/squirrelmail + mbox ?"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: mutt + dovecot/squirrelmail + mbox ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:12:55 -0300 To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@familiasanchez.net>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:55:33AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:50:01PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > In summary: If you have big mailboxes, like mailinglists,
> > you will go better with Maildir or IMAP
>
> Mail store format and the remote access method are orthogonal, except in
> the case of Cyrus. UW lets you store IMAP accessible mail in mbox,
And, for the record, Cyrus uses an MH-like store (looks a lot like
Maildir), with indexes for the most needed headers. The indexes work so
well, that a folder that with maildir would take mutt a minute to open
(100k+ messages, xfs), takes about 5s in Cyrus with a proper IMAP
client (Mulbelry. Anyone knows of a DFSG MUA that is actually a real
IMAP client and not some lame-ass kludge on top of a filesystem/pop3
client like mutt or Thunderbird?)
Of course, you better have that Cyrus spool on a serious filesystem,
like XFS or 2.6.11 ext3 with btrees and htrees enabled, or else the
server will dislike heavily users that attempt to place too many
messages in a folder...
Also, for the record, IMHO UW IMAPd is a horrid joke of a imap daemon
that should have already died an horrible death two years ago, or at the
very least it should come with a surgeon's general warning that says "Do
not use this crap if your folders have typically more than 100
messages".
-- Henrique M. Holschuh (still without his witty sig :( ) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Roberto C. Sanchez: "Re: Homebuilt vs. debian packages, and "apt-get upgrade""
- In reply to: Roberto C. Sanchez: "Re: mutt + dovecot/squirrelmail + mbox ?"
- Next in thread: Steve Lamb: "Re: mutt + dovecot/squirrelmail + mbox ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|