Re: Gateway newsgroup problem (redux - long)
From: Marco d'Itri (md_at_Linux.IT)
Date: 06/10/05
- Previous message: David Dorward: "Re: Top posting (a different point of view)"
- In reply to: Anthony Rowe: "Re: Gateway newsgroup problem (redux - long)"
- Next in thread: Tony Rowe: "Draft FAQ [was Re: Gateway newsgroup problem (redux - long)]"
- Reply: Tony Rowe: "Draft FAQ [was Re: Gateway newsgroup problem (redux - long)]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:54:34 +0200 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Jun 10, Anthony Rowe <ay986@chebucto.ns.ca> wrote:
> Other linux.debian.* gateways are fine because people using those can be
> expected to know how gateways work. An faq about what the gateway is
There are no other gateways.
> and how it is meant to be used, specific to this list and which
> propagates to linux.debian.user only, may be a good idea?
Maybe. Do you want to write one?
Send it to me, formatted as an email/usenet article.
-- ciao, Marco
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature
- Previous message: David Dorward: "Re: Top posting (a different point of view)"
- In reply to: Anthony Rowe: "Re: Gateway newsgroup problem (redux - long)"
- Next in thread: Tony Rowe: "Draft FAQ [was Re: Gateway newsgroup problem (redux - long)]"
- Reply: Tony Rowe: "Draft FAQ [was Re: Gateway newsgroup problem (redux - long)]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]