Re: Sudden constant spoofing of my address

From: Anthony Campbell (ac_at_acampbell.org.uk)
Date: 06/10/05

  • Next message: Dave Babb: "Pre-Port Usability Question"
    Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:40:57 +0100
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    On 10 Jun 2005, Andy Smith wrote:
    > On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
    > > Since last night my in-box is being filled up by dozens of bounced
    > > messages. Evidently someone or something is spoofing my address and
    > > sending out bogus messages.
    >
    > This is referred to as a "joe job" (google for more info). In your
    > case it is most likely not personal and is the result of a spammer
    > randomly choosing your address for a massive spam run. In other
    > cases, incredibly offensive email content is sent with someone
    > else's address, so that they have to deal with the backlash.
    >
    > > I normally get a few of these and mark them as spam, but this is
    > > ridiculous. Is there any way to stop it happening?
    >
    > The bounces mostly come because the spam is sent to an address list
    > with a large number of local parts that don't exist.
    > Poorly-designed email servers like Exchange or unpatched qmail will
    > accept the spam, find they have no local part for it to be delivered
    > to, and then are required by RFC to send a bounce back to the sender
    > (your faked address).
    >
    > If all email servers in the world took a more sensible approach of
    > working out their valid local parts during the SMTP conversation
    > then they could reject with a 5xx code each one that was invalid.
    > No bounce would then be generated.
    >
    > In the meantime, if you are really suffering, you can temporarily
    > discard all emails from the null sender (<>), which should only be
    > bounces. Note however that mails from the null sender are required
    > to be accepted by RFC. Also note that it is best not to outright
    > reject such emails as some sender verification schemes which connect
    > back to your MX and probe with the null sender address may object,
    > leading to your outgoing email being affected.

    Thanks for the reply.

    Yes, I remember I've heard about joe jobs now. I've noticed that all the
    bounced messages have the line:
            
            Return-Path: MAILER-DAEMON@s1.uklinux.net

    (uklinux.net provide my broadband connection).

    I've told procmail to direct all such messages to a mailbox called
    blackhole and this seems to have provided a work-around for the problem
    until it goes away (I hope).

    Anthony

    -- 
    ac@acampbell.org.uk    ||  http://www.acampbell.org.uk for
    using Linux GNU/Debian ||  blog, book reviews, electronic  
    Microsoft-free zone    ||  books and skeptical articles
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Dave Babb: "Pre-Port Usability Question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Block Senders
      ... Wouldn't it be neat to flood these spamers with their own Spam? ... Spammers are known to forge email ... addresses as the sender. ... and got over 200 bounces. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress)
    • Re: Fedora List Bounces?
      ... If these bounces went to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx, ... the envelope sender was blank, ... impersonated sender gets to deal with the spam. ... That way real sending servers can generate a bounce for the ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: emails
      ... First are the mass mailer worms. ... propagation by phony bounces; ... so they bounce to the apparent sender. ... valid email address as the sender in their spam runs. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Sudden constant spoofing of my address
      ... The bounces mostly come because the spam is sent to an address list ... and then are required by RFC to send a bounce back to the sender ... to be accepted by RFC. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: content filtering
      ... opinion on experience that's limited to dealing with domestic US ... Considering that the large majority of spam originates from the US, ... Now all you need is some method of identifying the sender. ... 550 code would come to the attention of the mail server admin who could ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)

    Loading