Can't upgrade from woody to sarge (sources.list problem?)

From: Adam Fabian (awfabian_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/01/05

  • Next message: Pedro Antonio Reche: "unsubscribe"
    Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:43:15 -0500
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    I have Debian installed on my xbox. It's Xebian 1.01, or something like
    that. As nearly as I can tell, it's exactly the same as woody except
    that the kernel is a 2.4 kernel with xbox patches, and a backported
    version of XFree86 4.3.0, and some customized configuration files.

    xbox:/# cat /etc/debian_version
    3.0

    xbox:/# gcc -v
    Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/2.95.4/specs
    gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)

    Anyway, my point being that I'm pretty sure it's almost pure woody and
    looks a lot more like a customized Debian than a derived distribution.

    So, my sources list looks like this:

    deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ sarge main non-free contrib
    deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge/non-US main contrib
    non-free
    deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US sarge//non-US main
    contrib non-free
    deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
    deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ sarge main
    deb-src http://perso.wanadoo.fr/debian/ unstable main

    Then I type:

    xbox:/# apt-get update
    [snip]
    Hit http://ftp.us.debian.org sarge/main Release
    [snip]
    xbox:/# echo $?
    0
    (In other words, everything appears successful.)

    xbox:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
    Reading Package Lists... Done
    Building Dependency Tree... Done
    Calculating Upgrade... Done
    The following packages have been kept back
      lame liblame0 libpostproc0 mplayer-586
    2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
    Need to get 1145kB of archives. After unpacking 4096B will be freed.
    Do you want to continue? [Y/n]

    I expected that a lot more packages would need upgrading (like, say,
    gcc).

    How can I upgrade? I don't want to mess with the kernel package, so I
    guess I should pin it or something. There might be some configuration
    file holding everything in place.

    -- 
    Adam Fabian <awfabian@gmail.com>
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Pedro Antonio Reche: "unsubscribe"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: the best Linux for me
      ... I've ben using debian on my desktop for about 8 years, ... What's Debian's package / distro system called? ... cl-clx-sbcl - An X11 Common Lisp client library for SBCL ... You can also see how out of date my unstable install ...
      (comp.lang.lisp)
    • Re: what version?
      ... > handling of RedHat package management had been jumbled by an architect who ... Debian, Gentoo, etc. ... As I mentioned earlier, Debian-compatible installation media (including ... the stable-branch archive, because he felt it was in particularly good ...
      (comp.os.linux.setup)
    • Re: CLARITY re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is prematurewithbuggy 6.3
      ... If the new php package works fine on your build box, ... For most of the ports this works, ... Even debian has no plus point there (at least in our environment at ... I've had a disk down of course it was in gmirror and the situation ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: bits/news from the users of Debian?
      ... "Le bottin des jeux Linux" speaks about 800 Linux games and i hope that's growing. ... I start with Debian, then test Mandrake because it seem's at this time very complicated. ... I think graphics interface for installation is a good thing: you have make a good job! ... I use Debian Sid and I have experiment a lot of problem some years ago because i install too recent package on Sid which are not well tested. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: Debians policy regarding security updates
      ... Please note that by "the Debian developers", here, you're referring to ... the individual package maintainers, not the Security Team. ... package maintainer duly ground out packages containing it, ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)