Re: failing to upgrade udev
From: kamaraju kusumanchi (raju.mailinglists_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/15/05
- Previous message: Clive Menzies: "Re: Migrating from Windows to Debian - keeping email messages from Outlook Express"
- In reply to: Lorenzo Taylor: "Re: failing to upgrade udev"
- Next in thread: Brad Sims: "Re: failing to upgrade udev"
- Reply: Brad Sims: "Re: failing to upgrade udev"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:11:12 -0400 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Lorenzo Taylor wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
># Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3
># (using .../archives/udev_0.062-4_i386.deb) ...
># udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted.
>
><rant>
>This is a classic example of probably the only thing I dislike about Debian.
>
>
In such a case, you should use stable distribution. Unstable is not for
everyone. It is useless to complain about instability of unstable.
Unstable is meant just to be that.
I have seen many people on this list encouraging people to use unstable.
This would be an example why people should not advice Debian newbies to
use unstable or even testing for that matter.
raju
-- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi Graduate Student, MAE Cornell University http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Clive Menzies: "Re: Migrating from Windows to Debian - keeping email messages from Outlook Express"
- In reply to: Lorenzo Taylor: "Re: failing to upgrade udev"
- Next in thread: Brad Sims: "Re: failing to upgrade udev"
- Reply: Brad Sims: "Re: failing to upgrade udev"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
