a kernel compilation question
From: Doofus (doofus_at_bulldoghome.com)
Date: 07/19/05
- Previous message: Alex Malinovich: "Re: default info browser"
- Next in thread: Elimar Riesebieter: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: Elimar Riesebieter: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: kamaraju kusumanchi: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: John Hasler: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: Colin: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: Ryan Schultz: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:43:06 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
The debian reference manual says there are two ways, the debian standard
method:
http://www.uk.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-kernel.en.html#s-kernel-debian
and the classic method:
http://www.uk.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-kernel.en.html#s-kernel-classic
where the first uses a kernel deb package and lots of nice
debian-make-it-simple utilities, while the second uses the method
outlined in the documentation distributed with the kernels source.
Is there any reason not to combine the two methods, ie download the
latest 2.4 from kernel.org (which I want), but use "make-kpkg clean" and
"make-kpkg kernel_image" (which I like)?
Thanks
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Alex Malinovich: "Re: default info browser"
- Next in thread: Elimar Riesebieter: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: Elimar Riesebieter: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: kamaraju kusumanchi: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: John Hasler: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: Colin: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Reply: Ryan Schultz: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]