On using Mozilla instead of Firefox (was: Re: Disappearing text in Mozilla)

From: Rogério Brito (rbrito_at_ime.usp.br)
Date: 07/19/05

  • Next message: John Hasler: "Re: a kernel compilation question"
    Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:13:30 -0300
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    Hi, and I see that I am starting a (potential) flamewear, but this is
    something that I feel that must be (rationally) discussed and addressed.

    On Jul 18 2005, Leonid Grinberg wrote:
    > I do not have this problem. In any case, I suggest you use Firefox as
    > opposed to the old mozilla.

    Well, calling it "old mozilla" is ignoring some facts, in my humble
    opinion.

    When I first used Mozilla in the Mxx milestones era, I thought that it was
    way too heavy for my own computer, compared to, at the time, Opera.

    I wouldn't like to use it as my default browser and even survived the ads
    of Opera (which never really annoyed me, actually) just for the sake of
    being able to use a browser that would not make my computer crawl.

    As I perceive both in mailing lists and in sites like Slashdot, it seems
    that people in the US or Europe are much more frequently upgrading their
    computers than people in other parts of the world can (which is my case).
    The fastest computer that I had access to recently had a Duron 600MHz and
    now I just got a "new" (used) processor that is a Duron 1100MHz. Quite an
    upgrade, but still not as much as people changing the whole system at a
    time.

    Anyway, back to Mozilla, at that time, the suite was slower than the
    alternatives and I just wished that it did one thing and did it right, in
    the good old Unix fashion.

    One year ago (more, perhaps), with the same computer (modulo processor), I
    decided to use only Free Software and was excited with Firefox (which was
    obviously not even named this, as most can recall).

    Excited with the promise that it would "shrink" in size in comparison to
    the suite/Seamonkey (which was one of the main arguments that they were
    using in the Phoenix 0.4 or so days), I started to use it as my main
    browser and also advocating its use for fellow people and to my students.

    And then came Thunderbird. I also tried it, but was a bit puzzled at first
    to see that it was a bigger download than Firefox. I thought "well, they
    may reduce the size of it in the future".

    But now, here we stand, with Thunderbird and Firefox being two excellent
    pieces of software (and also the suite) and with Firefox being the primary
    focus of the Mozilla project, but something strange is easily noticed:
    their size for Windows is about the half of the size for Linux.

    Point 1 here: perhaps some components between Firefox and Thunderbird could
    be shared so that the sum of their binary sizes would be approximately the
    same as that of the suite.

    Furthermore, once loaded, Firefox uses about the same amount of virtual
    memory (in my, admittedly, non-scientific tests) as the suite, after
    browsing some pages. And that's not even counting having Thunderbird
    launched, which uses a bit more memory (as expected).

    Point 2 here: Here I think that some components/libraries being shared
    between Firefox and Thunderbird would decrease the amount of memory needed
    by them (and since shared libraries under Unix systems are put in read-only
    pages, they can be actually used among multiple software, but only if the
    software actually declares this to the library loader).

    For saving space, I actually came back to using the suite rather than
    Firefox and Thunderbird.

    Point 3 here: Another thing that is slightly disturbing is that, under the
    very same hardware, running Firefox under Windows 2k and Debian to visit
    www.macslash.org one notices a dramatic slower scroll speed of that site.
    Something must clearly be different between the "same application" to have
    this behaviour (hint: you'll likely to be annoyed at this if you have a
    slower computer).

    So, if anybody could help with further observations, I would love to know
    how your experiences relate to mine.

    Just my 2 cents, Rogério.

    -- 
    Rogério Brito : rbrito@ime.usp.br : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito
    Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de
    Homepage on freshmeat:  http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: John Hasler: "Re: a kernel compilation question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [SLE] FireFox broken, is SuSE Pro becoming a test bed like Fedora?
      ... If I use Liquid or Baghira, Firefox ... > uninstalled both thunderbird and firefox, and then re-installed mozilla. ... > install and tried running that again. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: News Reader
      ... >>of the Mozilla Foundation is on Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla ... >Why do you use Mozilla, Firefox, Thunderbird, ect, ect, that seem to have ... Tab X: Adds a close button to each tab that is open. ...
      (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
    • Re: Zukunft von Linux
      ... Ein Aufschrei des Entsetzens! ... Vorher hatte ich Mozilla. ... Wenn ich es jetzt so lese, Aufschrei auch für Firefox? ... Thunderbird vor einigen Fehlern bewahrt. ...
      (de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc)
    • Re: OT: Mozilla/Firefox (was:Re: Windoze ends year with a major cert ...)
      ... >>Firefox and Mozilla are different browsers? ... > Mozilla is a suite of browser, mail/news client, IRC client and HTML editor. ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: OT - Netscape 7.2 question
      ... Click on "send page" and my Mozilla email account comes up in the composer. ... In fact it wouldn't have to be "imported" - I can read the same 'database' now with both NS and Thunderbird. ... So, does the suite contain Thunderbird, or a Thunderbird-like reader? ... So now the question is does the latest version of the suite have Send Page in Firefox? ...
      (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)

    Loading