Re: LVM and Windows
From: Daniel Johnson (teknotus_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/26/05
- Previous message: Josh Battles: "Re: OT: In defence of ``newbie-picking'' (was:Re: MS Project 2003)"
- In reply to: Hendrik Boom: "Re: LVM and Windows"
- Next in thread: Hendrik Boom: "Re: LVM and Windows"
- Reply: Hendrik Boom: "Re: LVM and Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:06:15 -0700 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> It contains equivalent functionality to LVM and more.
> It makes me wonder whether it actually uses LVM, or has an independent
> implementation.
>
> From my understanding at one point they were competing technologies, and
used different kernel modifications to achieve their goals, but now they are
cooperating.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Josh Battles: "Re: OT: In defence of ``newbie-picking'' (was:Re: MS Project 2003)"
- In reply to: Hendrik Boom: "Re: LVM and Windows"
- Next in thread: Hendrik Boom: "Re: LVM and Windows"
- Reply: Hendrik Boom: "Re: LVM and Windows"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]