Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled
From: Dave Ewart (davee_at_sungate.co.uk)
Date: 08/02/05
- Previous message: T Leconte: "Vlans Implementation .... "bad: scheduling while atomic!" ?¿?"
- In reply to: sYs: "Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled"
- Next in thread: sYs: "Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled"
- Reply: sYs: "Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 14:46:07 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Tuesday, 02.08.2005 at 15:25 +0200, sYs wrote:
> >Those timestamps above suggest to me that the kernel was *compiled* on
> >'July 26', but that it was *installed* on 'Aug 1' - that alone doesn't
> >necessarily indicate a problem.
> >
> >Dave.
> >
> >
> Do you think that the *config-2.6.11.12-grsec* is the configuration file
> for the *current running kernel*, is it sure?
It *looks* like it *is* the config for the current running kernel, but I
don't think there's any way to be certain.
> If it is, what's the problem? :\
Hard to say. Perhaps recompile the kernel again and double-check the
HIGHMEM settings.
Dave.
-- Please don't CC me on list messages! ... Dave Ewart - davee@sungate.co.uk - jabber: davee@jabber.org All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature
- Previous message: T Leconte: "Vlans Implementation .... "bad: scheduling while atomic!" ?¿?"
- In reply to: sYs: "Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled"
- Next in thread: sYs: "Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled"
- Reply: sYs: "Re: 884MB instead of 1024MB memory and HIGHMEM enabled"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
