Re: OT: Electoral College [Re: U.S. federal income tax program]
From: David Jardine (david_at_jardine.de)
Date: 08/29/05
- Previous message: Tom Allison: "Re:"
- In reply to: Roberto C. Sanchez: "OT: Electoral College [Re: U.S. federal income tax program]"
- Next in thread: Katipo: "Re: OT: Electoral College [Re: U.S. federal income tax program]"
- Reply: Katipo: "Re: OT: Electoral College [Re: U.S. federal income tax program]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:30:29 +0200 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 09:48:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> [...]
> The electoral college has a very specific purpose, to prevent the
> mob rule from swaying election results.
> [...]
> Personally, however, I like how Nebraska (and I forget the other
> state) does it. They split the state's electoral votes by the
> percentage of popular vote. It would be better if all states did
> that, if only because it provides a more accurate reflection of what
> the people want without allowing sudden changes in the public mood
> to unduly affect election results.
Wouldn't that give you the same result as a direct popular election,
"mob rule" as you call it?
-- David Jardine "Running Debian GNU/Linux and loving every minute of it." -L. von Sacher-M.(1835-1895) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Tom Allison: "Re:"
- In reply to: Roberto C. Sanchez: "OT: Electoral College [Re: U.S. federal income tax program]"
- Next in thread: Katipo: "Re: OT: Electoral College [Re: U.S. federal income tax program]"
- Reply: Katipo: "Re: OT: Electoral College [Re: U.S. federal income tax program]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|