Re: sarge: the worst distro?
From: Roberto C. Sanchez (roberto_at_familiasanchez.net)
Date: 09/10/05
- Previous message: a joe: "sarge: the worst distro?"
- In reply to: a joe: "sarge: the worst distro?"
- Next in thread: a joe: "Re: sarge: the worst distro?"
- Reply: a joe: "Re: sarge: the worst distro?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 18:42:30 -0400 To: a joe <null2004@hotmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 10:37:14PM +0000, a joe wrote:
> i have used Debian 1.2, 2.0, 2.1, potato and woody. with each new version come
> some new features that i found useful.
>
> a few days ago i installed sarge and found it the worst Debian distro because
> no new features is valuable to me.
Wow. You have a real strange sense of what constitutes a feature. Two
completely upgraded major desktop environments and a number of upgraded
minor desktop environments and support for a host of new applications
like Firefox, Thunderbird, Apache2, OpenOffice.org, and so on, are just
a small fraction of what has changed.
In any case, just send the CDs back with the receipt and original proof
of purchase. I am sure the Debian project will happily refund you 1000%
percent of the purchase price.
-Roberto
-- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: a joe: "sarge: the worst distro?"
- In reply to: a joe: "sarge: the worst distro?"
- Next in thread: a joe: "Re: sarge: the worst distro?"
- Reply: a joe: "Re: sarge: the worst distro?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
