Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today
a.list.address_at_gmail.com
Date: 09/13/05
- Previous message: H. S.: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- In reply to: H. S.: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Next in thread: Marc Wilson: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Reply: Marc Wilson: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:46:56 -0500 To: debian-users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
On 9/12/05, H. S. <hs.samix@gmail.com> wrote:
> Neither can I. gnomeo-desktop-environment depends upon sound-juicer >
> 2.10.1. And such a sound-juicer doesn't exist in Debian Testing at present.
And this begs the question, why does gnome-desktop-environment
*depend* on something like sound-juicer? Shouldn't that be a
"recommends"? What if I prefer to use a different CD ripping app?
Why should I *have* to install sound-juicer?
And this same question applies to a lot of other packages. Often if I
try to upgrade a bunch of stuff, I can't do it, because one little
package (one that I don't even use) that something big like GNOME or
KDE depends on, isn't available in the version that KDE or GNOME
depend on, so apt wants to remove *all* of GNOME or KDE. But I don't
even use that little package! And I'm not talking about libs, I'm
talking about apps.
- Previous message: H. S.: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- In reply to: H. S.: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Next in thread: Marc Wilson: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Reply: Marc Wilson: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|