Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today
a.list.address_at_gmail.com
Date: 09/16/05
- Previous message: Alejandro Bonilla Beeche: "Re: can not edit XF86Config-4"
- In reply to: Byron Hillis: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Next in thread: Jason Clinton: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:47:25 -0500 To: debian-users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
On 9/15/05, Byron Hillis <the.metric@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Therefore if you install g-d-e and it pulls in everything for your GNOME
> desktop environment, then ALL the packages that it does pull in will be
> marked as Automatic. Therefore, if through a dependency problem, i.e.
> sound-juicer, the g-d-e cannot be properly upgraded, then if you
> remove g-d-e, all the GNOME desktop will be removed because
> aptitude thinks that they were only installed to satisfy the dependency.
> Thus you get a mess.
I'm not sure if that's unique to Aptitude. I use Synaptic most of the
time, and sometimes apt-get directly when Synaptic won't let me force
more than one package at a time to come from unstable. But I still
can't upgrade to GNOME 2.10 (all of it; I have some parts of it from
2.10) because of sound-juicer. *sigh*
- Previous message: Alejandro Bonilla Beeche: "Re: can not edit XF86Config-4"
- In reply to: Byron Hillis: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Next in thread: Jason Clinton: "Re: Gnome 2.10 going in to etch today"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|