Re: Tape Backup advice needed - dump, tar etc.

From: Ben Pearre (bwpearre_at_alumni.princeton.edu)
Date: 09/18/05

  • Next message: Adam Hardy: "Re: o.t. sugestions for entity modeler"
    Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:00:21 -0600
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    > On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 11:13 -0500, J French wrote:
    > > How are most people backing up to tape with Debian (or linux in
    > > general)? I need a robust backup because this will be a production
    > > server. Advice is appreciated.

    I ran a Linux lab for a while. Ended up with one of those 200G tape
    drives running off a NetApp fileserver. Since the main filesystem was
    on Raid5 I only did a weekly tape dump and stored the tapes in my
    apartment. It worked fine as long as we only had 200G of data, but
    manually changing tapes is an enormous hassle! I can't imagine anyone
    running a large site with a single-tape drive. Do you have the
    hardware angle under control?

    I started out with a nice full/incremental system using dump, but I
    believe that during the time when everything would fit on one tape I
    was just using tar and doing a full backup each time (everything
    worked unattended except picking up the tape on Friday and swapping
    the new one in, so that was fine by me).

    Reasons not to do that:

    1) If you have more data than will fit in a single tape (or you're in
       a rush), you will want to do full/incremental backups. The
       incrementals had better each fit on one tape, but the fulls won't,
       of course. And swapping tapes is really really tedious!!!

       However, if you can afford a robotic tape drive, such as those from
       Tadpole (AIR they start at around $10k), you might be very happy
       with tapes.

       The problem is still remembering to take the tapes offsite in case
       the building burns down.

    2) If you ever do want to restore less than the whole filesystem,
       tapes make it hard to find (and then there's the whole offsite
       thingy). I used tapes because the backup was meant as a measure
       against catastrophic failure only--the NetApp handled daily
       accidental deletions, disk failures, etc, perfectly. But if you
       don't have such a nice fileserver, you care more!

    My current solution for my personal computer is an external USB2 disk,
    and faubackup. Not offsite :( but very cost-effective, and faubackup
    basically pulls the same stunt that the NetApp did (on the file level
    rather than inodes, so not as sophisticated nor efficient). So I have
    nightly backups for a week, weekly for a month, monthly for 3, annual
    forever, or whatever you like, of everything I need, at my fingertips.
    200G drives are now <$200, and you can easily add more. As I recall,
    100G tapes were $100, and that's not counting the (then) $4000 tape
    drive. For a company a big cheap fileserver would be more appropriate
    for this, but you get the idea. Oh, by the way, last I checked (over
    a year ago) faubackup was terribly, terribly slow and needs work. But
    I threw it out there as a random idea.

    So happens that I can get away with no offsite without feeling too
    guilty by using Unison to sync my desktop to my laptop, which tends to
    live offsite. But for a real company, this would be an interesting
    "solution."

    But what seems to me to be the best is a mutual arrangement with
    someone offsite, along the lines of each party saying "Here's x bytes
    of network-accessible storage and a login account for you." Then,
    rdist your filesystem to the remote site (or ideally something
    cleverer like CVS/Subversion/etc). Why don't more people do this?
    I'm thinking of setting this up for my current lab--any words of
    warning?

    May all your best data be immortalised!

    -Ben

    --
    Ben Pearre          http://hebb.mit.edu/~ben       PGP: CFDA6CDA
             Free music at http://hebb.mit.edu/FreeMusic
    Don't let Bush read your email!             http://www.gnupg.org
    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Adam Hardy: "Re: o.t. sugestions for entity modeler"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Offsite backup options
      ... you'd want to run it on a workstation so you don't hang the server, ... I like Exabyte VXA Drives for this. ... Until our backups start to exceed a single tape I just wanted to use ... the Built-In SBS Backup which works pretty good for our current needs. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Help Needed: Tape Backup Save Set
      ... >>explicit MOUNT helps me determine just where the problem is. ... so I just simply have backup mount the tape every time. ... Once I get a good set of TLZ drives, the jobs all tend to run fine. ...
      (comp.os.vms)
    • Re: NT Backup - WHAT A JOKE!
      ... I realize this forum may be dedicated to SBS but since ... REV USB drives and downloaded the latest iomega driver. ... Let that solution rest for self changer tape bank users who have ... possible to just follow the prompts and setup a backup scheduled to run ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Back up failing
      ... MS is dropping tape support in SBS ... SBS Backup was starting...and the erroring out at 8:03pm every ... I use USB drives for archives....not daily backups. ... backup with the "Unable to detect tape drive or tape media. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • RE: Backup to USB Drives and 3rd Party Software
      ... last I checked 2.5” drives are ... I agree, always get the extended warranty with Backup Exec, if nothing else ... I disagree with your statemet "As we all know tape drives for small ... USB drives might cost less upfront, but I dont have problems with the drive ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)