Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?
From: Angelo Bertolli (angelo_at_freeshell.org)
Date: 09/19/05
- Previous message: Ron Peterson: "Re: runlevel policy"
- In reply to: David Huemer: "Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?"
- Next in thread: Jon Dowland: "Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:21:17 -0400 To: David Huemer <david@dhuemer.at>
David Huemer wrote:
>I tried the provided .deb package and also compiled my own apache2
>server and discovered the following: If you use the Debian package all
>configuration is done in the apache2.conf and the httpd.conf is only for
>compatibility reasons. If you compile your own server, all configuration
>files are in the httpd.conf.
>
>I am not sure about the version of the apache2 server in the Debian
>package, but I think the version used is not the newest. Maybe this
>difference occurs because of different versions.
>
>
I think it's something the .deb package manager(s) do, since other
distrobutions I have used, have been using httpd.conf back to apache
1.3. I personally don't like the way Debian does this, but I think it's
easier to adjust because it's precompiled with a nice set of features.
Also I think apache likes to refer to their software as httpd, not as
"apache" since they have a plethora of projects and other useful software.
Angelo
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Ron Peterson: "Re: runlevel policy"
- In reply to: David Huemer: "Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?"
- Next in thread: Jon Dowland: "Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|