Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?
From: Jon Dowland (jon_at_dowland.name)
Date: 09/20/05
- Previous message: Aaron Maxwell: "embedding fonts"
- In reply to: Jared Hall: "Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:12:33 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:13:31AM -0700, Jared Hall wrote:
> In a way, I guess that this means httpd.conf is obsolete, since
> apache2.conf only includes httpd.conf... but that's more a matter of
> perspective. httpd.conf needs to be there for apt to properly install
> php5 (because it won't stick the "line LoadModule php5_module
> /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp5.so" into mods-enabled or
> apache2.conf),
If you are using the unstable php5 package, I'd suggest filing a bug so
it behaves as the other apache modules do.
> PS I don't see why people who want more organization could have just
> done all this on their own without all that fancy reprogramming Debian
> did. Perhaps these changes to httpd configuration actually make httpd
> run more efficiently (less information being included at certain
> times)? code consolidation = efficiency.
I very much doubt it.
-- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Aaron Maxwell: "embedding fonts"
- In reply to: Jared Hall: "Re: Apache2: httpd.conf or apache2.conf?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]