Re: Responses to the list (oops)
From: John Hasler (jhasler_at_debian.org)
Date: 09/23/05
- Previous message: Hendrik Boom: "Re: More than 2, but less than 3 GiB per process memory?"
- In reply to: Joe Smith: "Re: Responses to the list (oops)"
- Next in thread: Joe Smith: "Re: Responses to the list (oops)"
- Reply: Joe Smith: "Re: Responses to the list (oops)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:32:05 -0500
Joe Smith writes:
> Rember that email was not designed for threading. Threading was what
> newsgroups were invented for.
No. News was invented to reduce traffic. There used to be a rule of thumb
on how large a mailing-list should get before it was replaced by a
newsgroup.
> This is supposed to be to reduce spam, but in reality just as much spam
> comes to mailing lists as come to newsgroups.
I see very little spam on the newsgroups I read.
-- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Hendrik Boom: "Re: More than 2, but less than 3 GiB per process memory?"
- In reply to: Joe Smith: "Re: Responses to the list (oops)"
- Next in thread: Joe Smith: "Re: Responses to the list (oops)"
- Reply: Joe Smith: "Re: Responses to the list (oops)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|