Re: NUM Lock , Home, End

From: John Hasler (jhasler_at_debian.org)
Date: 09/23/05

  • Next message: Marty: "Re: NUM Lock , Home, End" 
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:38:18 -0500

    Bozhan Boiadzhiev writes:
    > huh what window manager i didn't use X at all

    Then you'll want to patch all the shells. 

    -- 
John Hasler
-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Marty: "Re: NUM Lock , Home, End"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: NUM Lock , Home, End - Patch
      ... John Hasler Wrote: ... >> huh what window manager i didn't use X at all ... >Then you'll want to patch all the shells. ... I haven't tested this "patch", but it might do the trick: ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: [PATCH] Unified lguest launcher
      ... launcher for such case would be the easy part! ... The shells comment is obsolete and should be deleted too, ... And RESERVE_TOP_ADDRESS isn't used in this patch? ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: NetSurf 1.0 released
      ... In article, David ... of the Window Manager, could you try removing that patch to see if ... (The 3D Patch, that is.) ... David - toro-danyo atcost uku fullstop co fullstop uk ...
      (comp.sys.acorn.apps)
    • Re: Headless X windows
      ... no X anything when it boots because there's no video ... >> I want an entire Gnome window manager from this box on my PC, ... I was having similiar problems until I put the patch on. ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)
    • Re: [patch] lockf(3) user-exploitable kernel panic
      ... [patch] lockfuser-exploitable kernel panic ... >is usually OK to introduce forward declarations into them. ... it might be worthwhile to patch the shells to use ... >libutil and submit those patches back to the maintainers. ...
      (freebsd-arch)