Re: cpufreqd: ondemand

From: Hanspeter Roth (hampi_at_rootshell.be)
Date: 09/29/05

  • Next message: Don Jackson: "500 million Linux laptops in next year" 
    Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:43:55 +0200
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org

      On Sep 29 at 14:20, Florian Dorpmueller spoke:

    > If you are able to understand german, I can recommend to have a look at
    > http://www.debianforum.de/wiki/?page=P4DynamischTakten. Furthermore I
    > propose to use the ondemand governor.

    Yes, I understand German. Thank you for the link!

    It seems that the `ondemand' governor is available only in 2.6.9 and
    later kernels.
    So far I have kept the 2.6.8 kernel.
    I'm now experimenting with powernowd which requires the `userspace'
    governor which is available with 2.6.8.

    -Hanspeter 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Don Jackson: "500 million Linux laptops in next year"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: [2.6 PATCH] Missing default governors choices
      ... Ondemand governor is in-kernel cpu frequency governor, ... >+ Use the CPUFreq governor 'powersave' as default. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • RE: [PATCH] cpufreq_ondemand
      ... This part of the patch has to go into ondemand governor. ... we poll at some X freq and check ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: remove cpu hotplug bustification in cpufreq.
      ... The ondemand governor seems to be singled out not because it has unique ... and seem to have the same broken locking. ... to "conservative" and now my laptop survives the night. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: cpufreqd: ondemand
      ... >> propose to use the ondemand governor. ... >Yes, I understand German. ... In my memory powernowd was better than cpufreqd. ...
      (Debian-User)