Re: virtual package? aptitude says "not a real package".
furufuru_at_ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Date: 09/30/05
- Previous message: Freddy Freeloader: "Joystick not recognized by games"
- In reply to: Kumar Appaiah: "Re: virtual package? aptitude says "not a real package"."
- Next in thread: Michael Spang: "Re: virtual package? aptitude says "not a real package"."
- Reply: Michael Spang: "Re: virtual package? aptitude says "not a real package"."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Sep 2005 18:54:35 -0700 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On my system, apt-cache show emacs-dl-wn gives me black, install says
> that package is unavailable.
Thanks for your response! I'm still puzzled. What's this "ghost"
package, then? The "mplayer" package seems to be another example.
If they are unavailable, then why do they show up when you type
$ aptitude search mplayer
for example. What does this mean?
> I think virtual packages are those which are actually generic software
> which have many options fitting the bill. For example, exim4, postfix,
> esmtp-run, sendmail etc. all `provide' the `mail-transport-agent'
> virtual package.
>
> See:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html#s-virtual
Thanks. That matches my understanding of virtual packages.
Regards,
Ryo
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Freddy Freeloader: "Joystick not recognized by games"
- In reply to: Kumar Appaiah: "Re: virtual package? aptitude says "not a real package"."
- Next in thread: Michael Spang: "Re: virtual package? aptitude says "not a real package"."
- Reply: Michael Spang: "Re: virtual package? aptitude says "not a real package"."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|