Re: Standard place for Bash Scripts
From: Alvin Oga (aoga_at_mail.Linux-Consulting.com)
Date: 09/30/05
- Previous message: Matt Price: "bootlog [was: control of modules?]"
- In reply to: Stephen R Laniel: "Re: Standard place for Bash Scripts"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: Standard place for Bash Scripts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:12:32 -0700 (PDT) To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Stephen R Laniel wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 07:47:14AM -0400, Scott Fitzgerald wrote:
> > I was wondering if there was a standard place for bash scripts. A
> > convention or "normal place" where they can be placed to be turned into a
> > command, accessable to all users.
as people have said .. /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin .. BUT ..
just to be a pita...
if you have a sun box or hp or aix or gazillion distro
on different architecture .. you'd have to use:
/usr/bin is usually on the local disk, so problems, but
/home/{$user}/bin.`uname -m`
/usr/local/bin.`uname -m`
both can be sometimes an NFS resource which will need
the whackynes of "uname -m"
and since scripts are typically independent of 'architecture",
i use /usr/local/scripts for all user defined scripts
and add mroe fun when you have /usr/local/bin/perl vs
/usr/bin/perl vs ... or /bin/bash vs /bin/sh being different
c ya
alvin
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Matt Price: "bootlog [was: control of modules?]"
- In reply to: Stephen R Laniel: "Re: Standard place for Bash Scripts"
- Next in thread: John Hasler: "Re: Standard place for Bash Scripts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
