Re: Newsreader: Best of the bunch?

furufuru_at_ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Date: 10/20/05

  • Next message: Cybe R. Wizard: "Re: changing default resolution" 
    Date: 19 Oct 2005 21:33:19 -0700
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org

    Steve Lamb wrote:
    > furufuru@ccsr.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
    > > Of course! But, I'm talking about COMMON functions such as
    > > selecting regions of text, copying it to the clipboard, pasting it,
    >
    > Which is what I alluded to so I have no idea why all this bluster
    > before getting to where I agree with you. *shrug*

    Sorry if I offended you. I didn't mean to. Anyway, we have agreed
    that it's better to have the same set of keys for common
    functionalities.

    > > jumping to another window,
    >
    > In what context? What happens when you have a window inside of a
    > window.... whoops.

    I guess my term "jumping to another window" may have been be confusing.
    I meant that you can go to any "buffers" within emacs. You can hide
    any buffer or show it as a window. All switching and selection are
    done with keyboards. And, since everything is a buffer, you can jump
    from mail summary "window" (showing subjects and senders of email)
    to your text file "window", for example.

    [...]
    > > Exactly. And that small percentage is what you use most
    > > frequently in your daily life. At least this is true for me.
    >
    > Which doesn't imply that one should program everything inside
    > a text editor.

    I'm not saying one should program everything inside a text editor.
    I'm not advocating that style. I completely agree with you.
    What I want is 1) common keystrokes for common functionalities
    and 2) that most things can be done with keyboard only. Emacs
    happens to give me both. As I said, if I find a better environment
    which gives me that, I'll switch to it.

    > The proper way would be to provide that functionality globally by a
    > controlling program or, failing that, community standards.

    Yes, that will do, too. I don't know if that's "the" proper way,
    though.

    [...]
    > > Perhaps you work very differently than I.
    > > I don't have a motivation to switch editors, so I don't know
    > > what problem is there in not switching editors.
    >
    > Flexibility comes to mind. Not only in one's work environment but
    > one's self. [...] Somehow not being able to use the exact same
    > keystrokes for some functions certainly hasn't killed my ability to
    > do work. In fact when confronted with a lack of options I can make
    > do with what is available.

    I see. That's the difference between you and me. You are much
    more flexible. When I use another editor, I constantly hit wrong keys,
    which is SO irritating that I can't use it. I have no choice. And,
    I'm feel so comfortable on emacs. If I switch, I need to switch once
    and for all.

    > > (Another important requirement is that the keys shouldn't
    > > be far from the home position. I hate to use arrow keys,
    > > for example. My keyboard even doesn't have ones!)
    >
    > Which is plain foolishness. Again the whole zen of the editor wars
    > thing. People quibble about the microscopic amount of time it takes them
    > to move their hands here and there yet want common keys.

    It's not a matter of time. Perhaps, you are so flexible that you
    don't see it. Well, how should I explain it? . . . Well, I feel more
    comfortable when my hands remain around the home position and
    uncomfortable when I need to move them away so often. I'm sure
    that that won't make any difference in terms of time. I'm not
    talking about the "zen"; I'm not talking about the kind of religious
    war you allude to. . . . Do you drive a car? What if the
    turn signal switch were located at the center console as a button
    and each time you use it you needed to reach it removing your hand
    away from the steering wheel? You'll eventually get used to it
    for sure. The time you need to operate it wouldn't be any different.
    Nevertheless, don't you think it more comfortable if the switch is
    located around the steering wheel as it actually is for most
    modern cars? Also, what if each model has the switch located
    at slightly different places? For example, I'm not able to operate
    the car radio without looking, when driving a different car from mine.
    Similarly, arrow keys are located differently from keyboard to
    keyboard (look at laptop keyboards); variations in alphanumeric keys
    are much less. This bothers me because I'm not flexible.
    (So, the control key is a BIG problem. Fortunately, I manage to
     map it to the left of the "A" key for every model.)

    It's comfortableness that I'm after. I don't think emacs is ideal,
    but it's better than anything I've experienced so far. You may call
    me inflexible. That's right. I'm easily irritated when things work
    differently. But, please don't call me a fool.

    Cheers,
    Ryo 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Cybe R. Wizard: "Re: changing default resolution"