Stock vs. Debian kernel sources
From: John O'Hagan (johnohagan_at_iprimus.com.au)
Date: 10/30/05
- Previous message: sqrt_at_bluebottle.com: "deny unwanted threads"
- Next in thread: Mitch Wiedemann: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Reply: Mitch Wiedemann: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Maybe reply: John O'Hagan: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Reply: Kjetil Kjernsmo: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:52:38 +1000
Hi all,
I'm looking for a brief summary of the differences between Debian kernel
sources (such as those provided by the linux-source-2.6* packages), and the
stock source from kernel.org.
The reason I ask is that I'm always keen to get the latest kernel,
particularly for ACPI improvements (I run testing on a laptop). I compile my
own from Debian sources, taking out features I don't use, so it's about a
quarter the size of the standard Debian one. I have to build the ipw2100 and
ieee80211 modules externally from source for networking anyway, and I use the
realtime-lsm and latest alsa-modules for audio work. I use kernel-package and
module-assistant to do it.
What do I need to be aware of if I use stock sources?
Thanks,
John
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: sqrt_at_bluebottle.com: "deny unwanted threads"
- Next in thread: Mitch Wiedemann: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Reply: Mitch Wiedemann: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Maybe reply: John O'Hagan: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Reply: Kjetil Kjernsmo: "Re: Stock vs. Debian kernel sources"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|