Requesting POSIX/SUS features from glibc

From: Paulo M C Aragão (yagpaulo-listas_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 10/31/05

  • Next message: Siju George: "Server hardware for Sarge"
    Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:32:19 -0200
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    Hi,

    Feature test macro _POSIX_SOURCE refers to which edition of POSIX.1 ?

    And _XOPEN_SOURCE refers to which SUS version ?

    I've got installed libc6 and glibc-doc both 2.3.5-7. I've carefully read the
    documentation from these packages, but couldn't find clear, unambiguous
    answers. It was clear that:

    _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=1 POSIX.1 1990
    _POSIX_C_SOURCE >=2 POSIX.2 1992
    _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 199309L POSIX.1 1993
    _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 199506L POSIX.1 1996
    _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 SUS2

    but _POSIX_SOURCE vaguely referred to the POSIX.1 standard, no edition
    mentioned, and _XOPEN_SOURCE to "functionality described in the X/Open
    Portability Guide".

    Thanks
    Paulo

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Siju George: "Server hardware for Sarge"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Request for comments on simple Ada program
      ... What I still do put in the source code - and don't like putting there - is the abstracts for the subprograms and packages. ... But how can I easily cross-link the documentation and the code? ... The conversation seems to be drifting towards Knuth's "literate programming". ...
      (comp.lang.ada)
    • Re: Plain TeX and long tables
      ... >> there's far less tutorial information available for plain users than ... >> authors deign to describe their packages, other than in the odd remark ... the reason why cataloguing of much of ctan is proceeding so slowly. ... documentation. ...
      (comp.text.tex)
    • Re: Documentation and Useability - a proposed solution
      ... > install it. ... > much more experience that I or any other noobie. ... > My argument is that as a noobie, I have access to packages that are ... > or even be able to seperate the grain from the chaff of documentation ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: ftp::Cd error message
      ... In the ftp documentation ... > We should submit an updated ftp man page to the tcllib project... ... Most of the server or client packages in tcllib use one of the log or ...
      (comp.lang.tcl)
    • Re: ftp::Cd error message
      ... In the ftp documentation ... > We should submit an updated ftp man page to the tcllib project... ... Most of the server or client packages in tcllib use one of the log or ...
      (comp.lang.tcl)