Re: Shutdown due to thermal event (sid)

From: Mauro Condarelli (MC5686_at_mclink.it)
Date: 11/04/05

  • Next message: Jon Dowland: "Re: hosts.allow no efective" 
    Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:16:11 +0100 (CET)
To: <hmh@debian.org>, debian-user@lists.debian.org

    > ==========================
    > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:02:55 -0200
    > From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
    > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    > Subject: Re: Shutdown due to thermal event (sid)
    > ==========================
    >
    > Use the attached lm85.c file instead of the one in the kernel.
    > These changes will be refactored and sent in a far more properly
    > way to hwmon upstream in a not so distant future.
    > USE IT AT YOUR OWN RISK.
    How am I supposed to use this modified lm85.c??
    The nearest to compiling i went is just to replace the same file
    in my kernel source tree (2.6.24-1-686).
    There it dies with:
    linux/i2c-sensor.h: No such file or directory
    linux/i2c-vid.h: No such file or directory

    > The logic inside the adm1027 is way better, use it. Setup the
    > chip directly
    > in sysfs, as lm-sensors usermode code is broken, too.
    again: how am I supposed to use this?
    I'm a little confused.
    What debian packages should I use?
    I would not want (if possible) to recompile/hand-modify things.
    I'm running sid because I need the eciadsl driver, else I would
    happily go back to stable (or testing).

    > /proc I2C is dead in 2.6.
    ok.

    Please, can someone point me to a *detailed* description of just
    how to have fan control this working?

    Just to answer to other people:
    1) I know that one fan is not enough for all thoose disks: I have 3, they simply are not connected to the motherbard but directly to the power supply (12V) so they do not show on sensors.
    2) I'm pretty sure that something is wrong since the RPMs of the various fans (primarily the CPU!) do not change with temperature (as they should) and do not respond to manual setting of PWMs.
    3) I hope the power supply is enough since I have a 500W PS.

    Thanks for Your attention
    Mauro 

    -- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
  • Next message: Jon Dowland: "Re: hosts.allow no efective"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [PATCH] Acer Aspire One Fan Control
      ... The idea of not starting the module in kernel mode was from Matthew. ... It seems like the fan in the aspire one's is used for cooling the ... introduced in the first place - to control the fan from kernel space, ... should control the fan and not a userspace tool. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH] Acer Aspire One Fan Control
      ... The idea of not starting the module in kernel mode was from Matthew. ... Not sure about how acer would handle a defect which could be caused by overheating and when they detect that software was controlling the fan. ... But I agree with you that either kernel or BIOS should control the fan and not a userspace tool. ... should be the BIOS or the kernel module. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Hardrive clicking / Kernel issue or daemon ?
      ... >> exact kernel issue I think it was about three back (FC1 Kernels ... physical dimensions of the disk change. ... then consider re-arranging the drives mountings for better cooling, ... fan port on the front ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: [PATCH] Acer Aspire One Fan Control
      ... temperature reaches 67-68 ... It is Celsius, the specification of the chipset and the atom core say ... user mode and turning off the fan. ... in the kernel instead of some flaky uspace thread which could maybe ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • PROBLEM: Unable to add subdirectory: Ooops in sys_add_file, called from kobject_register
      ... I got an Ooops while trying to load a little kernel module I wrote. ... The module's sysfs handling/initialization is based on ... and x86_64 hardware. ... # ACPI Support ...
      (Linux-Kernel)