Re: "Antispam UOL" spam from petsupermarket@uol.com.br?

From: loos (loos_at_qt1.iq.usp.br)
Date: 11/19/05

  • Next message: loos: "Re: "Antispam UOL" spam from petsupermarket@uol.com.br?" 
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:24:40 -0200

    Em Qui, 2005-11-17 às 20:32 -0800, David Kirchner escreveu:
    > On 11/17/05, Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> wrote:
    > > I don't know if that's exactly a black hole, but you can also try to address
    > > your messages to, at least, two other addresses:
    > >
    > > uol@uol.com.br
    > > security@uol.com.br
    >
    > whois also suggests sending complaints to mail-abuse@cert.br . It
    > would probably be best for customers of UOL to complain to them about
    > this, as they're in the best position to convince UOL to stop this
    > sort of behavior.
    >

    Unfortunately, most of their clients are very happy with this system: It
    is very effective for SPAM protection.

    In fact for non-list mail it is really a good idea: all you
    correspondents have to respond the challenge one and only one time,
    all subsequent mail is unchallenged.

    You just can't use this account for list subscriptions.

    Besides that they are one of the largest and most popular ISP here.

    Michel.

  • Next message: loos: "Re: "Antispam UOL" spam from petsupermarket@uol.com.br?"