Re: Filesharing on small LAN

From: Marty (martyb_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 11/29/05

  • Next message: H.S.: "getting random background colors in ssh xterm through gnome shortcuts"
    Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:05:39 -0500
    To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
    
    

    d@jerkface.net wrote:
       Linux NFS is
    > pretty unreliable in my experience, randomly failing in spite of
    > network connectivity every couple months or so -- but I haven't used
    > it seriously in a while (since 2.4.10 or so maybe), and it may have
    > improved. (I've waited for some improvement since 2.0.30-something and
    > gave up even checking in the 2.4 series, but who knows -- maybe a kernel
    > hacker somewhere started caring about NFS).

    I use NFS almost on a daily basis. The only problem I've had is the occasional
    inability to umount an NFS volume, which required a reboot until I learned to
    use the umount command repeatedly with the -f option (I presume once for each
    open file), but this may be a umount or kernel bug, since there seem to be other
    chronic issues connected to dynamic block devices in Linux. In addition, this
    NFS problem seems to have disappeared in the last year or two (with Linux 2.6), so
    things may have improved as you surmise.

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: H.S.: "getting random background colors in ssh xterm through gnome shortcuts"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Opinions on new Fedora Core 2 install with LVM 2 and snapshots?
      ... 95% of the Linux and Solaris client mount. ... The Linux server is where 5% of the UNIX client traffic goes, so NFS ... I just want snapshots, that's it. ... I also adopted XFS early on, ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: 6.1 and NFS
      ... This is becoming a show stopper for us moving forward with FreeBSD and may require us moving to a different OS (Linux or Solaris, ... Well, Solaris has the best NFS implementation out there and includes a number of subtle workarounds in their server code to reduce the number of and/or impact of problems seen doing heterogeneous networking against clients running other operating systems, but frankly, rpc.lockd isn't significantly more stable there on Solaris than on FreeBSD. ... In other words, if you plan to use NFS filesharing, you should make every effort to utilize software which functions with the classic ".lock"file mechanism rather than depending on lockf/flock/fcntl -based locking working. ... If a process wants the lock, ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: file-copy corruption
      ... I too am heavily into NFS, ... I guess the cause could lie anywhere between the source disk, the source disk controller, ... On any recent Linux, it would be very rare for there to be "no ... diff had an option to not follow symlinks..). ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: [PATCH 2.6.18-rc1] Make group sorting optional in the 2.6.x kernels
      ... in an operation on NFS on the client system, ... When there is no group id information passed downwards ... For someone of my level of knowledge of the kernel the README does not ... At the moment Linux is the only OS ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
      ... really nice if "umount -f" against a hung NFS ... because I had been told that NFS support had gotten better in Linux ... very unfortunate state such that I have to kill things by hand and ...
      (Linux-Kernel)