ldap conversion strategy
From: John Smith (netman1_at_home.nl)
Date: 11/29/05
- Previous message: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: [slightly OT]: GUI firewall applications in Linux"
- Next in thread: Jamie Thompson: "Re: ldap conversion strategy"
- Reply: Jamie Thompson: "Re: ldap conversion strategy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:20:35 +0100 To: debian-user@lists.debian.org <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Hi All,
I'm in the process of designing a plan to move a lot of debian
workstations (all with local users configured) to a ldap managed en-
vironment and have some choices to make, some easy, some tough. Here
one of the last category:
In order to keep the users using applications they derive from
their current local group memberships, I intend to recreate the local
groups (luckily all according to the default Debian installer policy
and uniquely identified by the same gid over all workstations) in the
ldap tree.
Should I create each and every group (audio with gid=29 for
example) in the ldap tree with the same group id as locally defined?
Will those two groups colide and if so, what is the best way
to solve this collision?
Sincerely,
Jan.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
- Previous message: Hugo Vanwoerkom: "Re: [slightly OT]: GUI firewall applications in Linux"
- Next in thread: Jamie Thompson: "Re: ldap conversion strategy"
- Reply: Jamie Thompson: "Re: ldap conversion strategy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
