Re: Upgrading from old Sarge (Testing) to Unstable

From: Johannes Wiedersich (johannes_at_physik.blm.tu-muenchen.de)
Date: 11/30/05

  • Next message: Johannes Wiedersich: "Re: root in non terminal"
    Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:31:29 +0100
    To: Yasir Assam <list1@endlessvoid.com>
    
    

    Yasir Assam wrote:

    > Thanks you all for your replies.
    >
    > It sounds like I should stick to stable for now at least (till I get
    more confident about what I'm doing).
    >
    > The package I'm most concerned about upgrading is the kernel. I built
    this from the sources at kernel.org and used a Debian tool (can't
    remember the name now) to make a .deb file from it and installed ith
    with dpkg I think.
    >
    > Will doing 'apt-get upgrade' or 'apt-get dist-upgrade' install the
    default kernel? Will it leave mine in the GRUB menu at least? I'd like
    to make sure that apt-get doesn't overwrite the kernel with the standard
    prebuilt one - I presume mine will still be in the GRUB menu at least.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Yasir
    >

    I recommend using aptitude instead of apt-get, ie. just replace apt-get
    update by aptitude dist-upgrade. aptitude is said to be better at
    resolving conflicts and recommendations.
    Apart from that it might be worthwhile to read the upgrade instructions
    from woody to sarge as they might apply to some of your packages:

    http://www.de.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-upgradingpackages

    aptitude updates existing software, but doesn't remove any software, ie.
    your kernel will stay. If you installed it via the debian tools, ie. via
    a .deb package it will be found in the 'Obsolete and locally created
    packages' section in aptitude.

    You can later install a new kernel or compile a new kernel, but as said
    in the release info, I strongly recommend to do this in a separate step:
      use your existing kernel to see if everything works fine; then add an
    additional kernel. If it continues to work fine, you can remove the old
    kernel.

    Johannes

    -- 
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org 
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
    

  • Next message: Johannes Wiedersich: "Re: root in non terminal"

    Relevant Pages

    • [PATCH 1/2] kbuil: add deb-pkg target
      ... # To prepare kbuild for more kernel packaging formats move all packaging ... # In top-level Makefile introduce generic support for all package ... Included the old rpm target for backward ... # and builddeb scripts. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Aptitude/Grub Problem -- Is this a bug?
      ... aptitude update && aptitude upgrade ... I lost a day tracking it down and finally found that when a kernel image ... upgrade and count on the system continuing to work well, ... What kernel package updated? ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: AMD64 Kernel Image in Etch
      ... I'm hoping to get a new AMD Athlon 64 processor, and I'm a little concerned that I can't identify the proper linux-image package. ... I do an "aptitude search linux-image" and look through what comes up, but none of them look like the right one. ... That said the generic 386 kernel, or better the K7 kernel in the i386 distribution will give you most of the extensions the amd64 is capable of without the need to reinstall. ...
      (Debian-User)
    • SuSE Security Announcement: kernel (update) (SuSE-SA:2001:039)
      ... Subject: SuSE Security Announcement: kernel ... properly boot after the package update. ... type of kernel rpm package to install. ...
      (Bugtraq)
    • [Full-disclosure] SUSE Security Announcement: kernel various security and bugfixes (SUSE-SA:
      ... This kernel update for SUSE Linux 10.0 contains fixes for XEN, ... This update contains the following security fixes: ... Download the kernel RPM package for your distribution with the ...
      (Full-Disclosure)