Re: UML skas patches for "linux" kernel packages
- From: Nic Ferrier <nferrier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:34:42 +0000
Tim Ruehsen <tim.ruehsen@xxxxxx> writes:
> Hi Nic,
>
> do you *really* need SKAS? UML works without SKAS, but I heard it should be
> somewhat slower without it. I have 2 UML envs running on my SID desktop (an
> old SID and a very old SuSE system). They are pretty well used by my
> collegues as development systems. And they do not feel much slower as real
> machines.
>
> But maybe you have completely different ideas about why you need
> SKAS.
UML works with thread tracing or SKAS. But My TT kernel is not working
very well; I'm experiencing strange lockups and peculiar things.
UML is a difficult beast to work on but it seems that TT is not well
used anymore. SKAS seems the favoured option.
So, does anyone know how to put the skas patch into the host kernel?
Nic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- UML skas patches for "linux" kernel packages
- From: Nic Ferrier
- Re: UML skas patches for "linux" kernel packages
- From: Tim Ruehsen
- UML skas patches for "linux" kernel packages
- Prev by Date: gmail as smarthost in exim
- Next by Date: Azureus and the TCP port 6881
- Previous by thread: Re: UML skas patches for "linux" kernel packages
- Next by thread: Strange behaviour with gigabit ethernet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|