Re: distribution upgrade question
- From: Magnus Therning <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:06:12 +0000
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:[..]
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Step two is to edit /etc/apt/sources.list. This is the relevant part ofrubbish. if not, why ? unstable includes everything.
mine:
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ testing/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.se.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
Yes, you should include 'testing' as well as 'unstable'.
I might have gotten this wrong, but I'm fairly sure that it's been the
case earlier that packages _moved_ from unstable to testing, meaning
that unstable actually didn't include everything. As I said though, I
might be wrong :-)
/M
--
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://therning.org/magnus
Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish.
Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship
by patent law on written works.
Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally
for machines to execute.
-- Quote from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
Attachment:
pgpG8KU6wSpwJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- distribution upgrade question
- From: Jude DaShiell
- Re: distribution upgrade question
- From: Magnus Therning
- Re: distribution upgrade question
- From: Thomas Jollans
- distribution upgrade question
- Prev by Date: Re: "make install" > debian package
- Next by Date: Re: (OT) - HP Officejet Pro K550
- Previous by thread: Re: distribution upgrade question
- Next by thread: Re: distribution upgrade question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
