Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Steve Lamb <grey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:04:40 -0700
Digby Tarvin wrote:
Consequently I think Debian's more restrictive policy on hardware support
during and after installation is a disadvantage. By all means give preference
to free and open software where there are alternatives, but the time to worry
about the open source friendlyness of the hardware is when making the original
purchase, not during the install.
I agree. I'm all for openness and freedom, don't get me wrong. But I
hardly see how openness and freedom that forces people into a certain position
is either open or free. It's just another close position. If it is our
machine then where's the fault in us doing what we want with it? Especially
in cases where a free and open alternative often doesn't exist.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Joey Hess
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- References:
- distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Attila Horvath
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Jon Dowland
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Attila Horvath
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Digby Tarvin
- distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- Prev by Date: Re: Mail-Followup-To in muttng? [was Re: Thought on receiving two answers...]
- Next by Date: Thanks! Re: good anti-virus software to use?
- Previous by thread: Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- Next by thread: Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|