Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Kent West <westk@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:15:06 -0500
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Saturday 22 April 2006 14:14, Steve Lamb wrote:
Monique Y. Mudama wrote:Include my name in the list of "people for whom socila contract is the #1
Well, debian is pretty obvious about its purpose. It's a link rightFunny, the #1 point for most people is apt, not the social contract.
from the front page. Maybe people should be choosing other distros if
they don't like bullet item number one of the social contract. Debian
without the social contract would be just another distro. In other
words, there would be no point to using debian without the contract.
#1 for *you* maybe.
point". I use debian because of its commitment to free software (which is part
of social contract) not because it has apt or some other cool software.
raju
Include my name in the list of "people for whom social contract is the
#1 point" also. When Debian ceases to be Free, then Debian ceases to
retain my loyalty.
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- References:
- distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Attila Horvath
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Monique Y. Mudama
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- From: Kamaraju Kusumanchi
- distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Problems installing Win4Lin
- Next by Date: Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- Previous by thread: Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- Next by thread: Re: distributions: UBUNTU vs DEBIAN
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|