Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:09:27 -0400
Larry Garfield wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 21:36, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Every single thing you describe would work *better* if education was
completely private. Why dork around with having the government track
where your child's assigned funds should end up if you change his/her
school? If all schools were private, you could even decide to spend
more or less. Don't like the school Johnny is in? Go to a different
one and start paying tuition there instead of the old one. See, no
government involvement necessary.
Can't afford to go to a school at all? Sorry, you don't get an education,
because it's a privilege of those who can afford to pay for it out of pocket
rather than a right as a citizen.
Sorry, I prefer knowing that everyone in my society has an opportunity for an
education by virtue of their being a member of the society.
I think you misunderstand. The point is that if public education were
eliminated, you would no longer be taxed for it. Thereforce, your
disposable income would be higher and you could then pay for your
children's education. That is, assuming you could not afford it before.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- From: Larry Garfield
- Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- References:
- Re: Social Contract
- From: Mumia W
- Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- From: Christopher Nelson
- Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- From: Larry Garfield
- Re: Social Contract
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Politics [Was:Social Contract]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|