Re: Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:01:57 -0500
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 23:57 +0200, Dirk wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:[snip]
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:06:21PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 20:52:10 +0200, Dirk wrote:
Ah, you know how it is... You get only attention if you troll...
Only if you're a jackass who pisses gasoline.
*Lots* of people ask questions on this list, and *very* few are
as actively obnoxious as you.
So, this is from the log of proftpd:
Passive data transfer failed, possibly due to network issues
Check your PassivePorts and MasqueradeAddress settings,
and any router, NAT, and firewall rules in the network path.
FTP no transfer timeout, disconnected
FTP session closed.
And the results of your examination of the router, NAT and firewall
rules is ...
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
"The best measure of a man's honesty isn't his income tax return.
It's the zero adjust on his bathroom scale."
Arthur C. Clarke
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- From: Dirk
- Re: Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- From: Florian Kulzer
- Re: Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- From: Andrew Sackville-West
- Re: Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- From: Dirk
- Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- Prev by Date: Re: O.T. dvd burning from the command line
- Next by Date: Re: Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- Next by thread: Re: Windows is the better OS for running a FTP server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
