Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
- From: "Felix C. Stegerman" <flx@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 17:35:40 +0200
* Jon Dowland <lists@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2006-06-02 12:27]:
Do you think that security support for unstable is good
enough for this? Or should I just go with stable +
backports?
I don't use unstable on servers anymore so I don't know if
security support is good enough, although I know it is
significantly better than it has been in the past, thanks to
the testing security team (who, iirc, also cover sid).
~ vim: set ft=mail tw=70 sw=2 sts=2 et:
^^ interesting idea, I think I shall borrow it :)
;-) I've been adding modelines to every file I edit lately. I've
come up with a vim function + key mapping to insert a modeline with my
preferred settings and the current file type as a comment of the form
used by the file type I'm editing (e.g. /* ... */ for C/C++, or # ...
for Perl/shell scripts etc.).
I'd just go with stable, keep an eye on the debian-security list and
backport anything that you really need (which should be very
little).
As I replied to Johannes Wiedersich (in another thread), I've decided
to go with stable and do some backports myself.
Many thanks for your insights.
- Felix
--
Felix C. Stegerman <flx@xxxxxxxxxx> http://obfusk.net
~ "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature."
~ -- R. Kulawiec
~ vim: set ft=mail tw=70 sw=2 sts=2 et:
Attachment:
pgpgbf9CxImoh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
- From: Jon Dowland
- Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
- From: Felix C. Stegerman
- Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
- From: Jon Dowland
- Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [backports & security]
- Next by Date: New DVD-R/RW/RAM drive
- Previous by thread: Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
- Next by thread: Re: is it a bad idea to use unstable on a server ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|