Re: konqueror's sftp slower than scp?
- From: Jon Dowland <lists@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 13:03:44 +0100
At 1154306545 past the epoch, Bruno Buys wrote:
Why is it that konqueror transfers files at 2.2mb/s
maximum in a sftp connection between two sarge machines,
while scp in the terminal transfers at 10mb/s in the same
machines?
Where are you transferring *to*? I find that (irrespective
of method used) transferring to a directory being "watched"
by FAM (such as ~/Desktop) is very, very slow, due to
constant polling about the file attrs whilst it's being
appended to.
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- konqueror's sftp slower than scp?
- From: Bruno Buys
- konqueror's sftp slower than scp?
- Prev by Date: Re: Security problem: who is responsible?
- Next by Date: best pactice - apache, rewrite, ssl, virtualhost or .htaccess
- Previous by thread: konqueror's sftp slower than scp?
- Next by thread: wengophone classic on sid
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
