Re: Thread-aware MUAs
- From: Hal Vaughan <hal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:37:35 -0400
On Thursday 24 August 2006 22:38, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 02:29, Ron Johnson wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:16, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:43, Ron Johnson wrote:
Daniel Rose wrote:
[snip]
People who don't like off-topic threads need a thread-aware
email reader, then the problem goes away....
Aren't all *ix mail clients thread-aware?
Pine isn't.
after 4.5 it is :-)
Well, it's still nonfree and thus insignificant. :o)
And how is that relevant to whether
(a) it's a *ix MUA, and
(b) it's thread-aware?
It doesn't matter. If it's non-free, it's not worth having.
But Paul, you're non-free.
Hal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thread-aware MUAs
- From: Paul Johnson
- Re: Thread-aware MUAs
- References:
- RE: Pumping Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin Laden Take Over List!)
- From: Daniel Rose
- Re: Thread-aware MUAs
- From: Ron Johnson
- Re: Thread-aware MUAs
- From: Paul Johnson
- RE: Pumping Gas in Oregon (WAS: Re: Osama Bin Laden Take Over List!)
- Prev by Date: Re: Asus sucks (Re: sata sucks)
- Next by Date: Re: Hey, Steve! (WAS: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon)
- Previous by thread: Re: Thread-aware MUAs
- Next by thread: Re: Thread-aware MUAs
- Index(es):