texlive and tetex tools
- From: T <mlist4suntong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:04:24 +0200
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:59:08 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 03:41:03AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
What is the difference between the two latex implementations availableI think the main difference is that texlive is the new packaging, which is
under debian?
more modular (or something like that) and that tetex is the one that has
been around for a while and will likely be deprecated and eventually
removed in favor of texlive.
Good question Micha. I didn't notice it until you asked. Seems it is time
to shift to texlive now.
However, if I remove tetex, all the following packages would be removed:
auctex* cjk-latex* dvi2ps* dvipdfmx* hevea* latex2html* latex2rtf*
and I didn't find any substition packages begin with texlive, execpt
texlive-pdfetex.
I can't live without the above tools. Does anyone has the solution?
Funny thing to me is that texlive even has a Tibetan language
package, texlive-lang-tibetan, but don't have a package for CJK. :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: texlive and tetex tools
- From: Carlos Moffat
- Re: texlive and tetex tools
- From: Andrew Schulman
- Re: texlive and tetex tools
- References:
- texlive vs, tetex
- From: Micha Feigin
- Re: texlive vs, tetex
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- texlive vs, tetex
- Prev by Date: Re: Creating custom deb package with conffiles overrides
- Next by Date: Re: Email programs that work.
- Previous by thread: Re: texlive vs, tetex
- Next by thread: Re: texlive and tetex tools
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
