Re: why...?!
- From: hendrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 23:28:37 -0400
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 08:24:03PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 05:04:02PM -0400, hendrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Indeed, I avoided SATA drives because they are so new on my AMD64,
though I have all the sockets for them on my motherboard. I still
eventually gave up on sarge because so much if the hardware was not
supported, and went to etch, which did install (though I've has other
problems).
Interesting. About nine months ago I installed two amd64 machines with
dual SATA-II drives in software RAID-1. Worked like a charm with the
unofficial Sarge installer.
Given that sarge did not support my graphics chip or my ethernet chip,
I thought it would really be tempting fate to try on a SATA drive as
well. Maybe I was wrong.
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why...?!
- From: derek
- Re: why...?!
- References:
- why...?!
- From: chikaku
- Re: why...?!
- From: Osamu Aoki
- Re: why...?!
- From: hendrik
- Re: why...?!
- From: Roberto C. Sanchez
- why...?!
- Prev by Date: cdrecord problems on sarge - status and alternatives ?
- Next by Date: CD Debian Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: why...?!
- Next by thread: Re: why...?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|