Re: Starting iptables
- From: cothrige <cothrige@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:39:07 -0500
* John Hasler (jhasler@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
The name is misleading. Ipmasq configures both NAT and firewalling. The
default configuration is suitable for most, but you can tweak the scripts
to do whatever you need.
However, it is not clear that you need a firewall at all. If you have only
the one machine, just don't open any ports.
I guess I have never really thought about it that way. I have just
assumed that I was better off for having something like a firewall in
place on any computer connected to the internet. And I have opened no
ports intentionally, but now I am wondering just how to find out what
ports are open and how they got that way? Any recommendations?
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Starting iptables
- From: Mumia W..
- Re: Starting iptables
- References:
- Starting iptables
- From: cothrige
- Re: Starting iptables
- From: Kevin Mark
- Re: Starting iptables
- From: cothrige
- Re: Starting iptables
- From: dtutty
- Re: Starting iptables
- From: cothrige
- Re: Starting iptables
- From: John Hasler
- Starting iptables
- Prev by Date: Re: How many DDs are there?
- Next by Date: Re: Firefox: Help > Report Broken Website
- Previous by thread: Re: Starting iptables
- Next by thread: Re: Starting iptables
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|