hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: Johannes Wiedersich <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:44:38 +0100
Preparing to buy a new server...
What is debian's opinion about hardware/software raid?
I have the feeling that software raid 1 is more reliable since if
anything goes wrong with the hardware, I could just take one or two
disks out of the server and put them into a workstation to get up and
running or copy data of the disks for the time until the hardware gets
fixed.
On the other hand, performance will probably be better with a dedicated
hardware raid controller.
What are your experiences?
Thanks,
Johannes
NB: we are talking about ibm server sxeries 226, raid controller sata
raid 5 vs software raid 1 using mdadm.
I would either use 3x250 GB + raid 5 or 4x250 GB + raid 1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: michael
- Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- Prev by Date: Apt-get "Segmentation faultsts ... 0%" SOLVED
- Next by Date: Re: what's the killer app for GNU/Linux systems?
- Previous by thread: Apt-get "Segmentation faultsts ... 0%" SOLVED
- Next by thread: Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|