Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:00:05 -0500
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:53:26PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This is only true if you use IDE and also put the mirrored pair on the
I did not want to mention this, because:
- software RAID-1 has bus overhead (the same data have to be transferred
multiple times to multiple drives, so writing may be twice as slow)
same channel (which would be incredibly foolish). Under every other
conceivable scenario, the system is smart enough to do both writes
simultaneously since they will be going difference places.
- software RAID-1 has high CPU and bus overhead in case of resyncing after
disk outage (hw raid does that itself)
Huh? I have built lots of RAID one systems and seen many of them
resync. They do have high I/O overhead (naturally, since it is a
resync). However, I have never seen one produce high CPU overload. I
suppose if you forgot to enable DMA on your drives, or somehow managed
to disable it (it is enabled by default), then you might see high CPU
load during resync. But then, you would see high CPU load for anything
that does any significant amount of I/O.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: Johannes Wiedersich
- Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: Dave Ewart
- Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- hardware raid vs. software raid
- Prev by Date: Re: quick scripting question - finding occurrence in many lines
- Next by Date: Re: what's the killer app for GNU/Linux systems?
- Previous by thread: Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- Next by thread: Re: hardware raid vs. software raid
- Index(es):